This call comes in response to what has been called Lesotho's worst drought in decades, causing large scale damage to growing crops as a result of low rainfall and fluctuating temperatures during the January-March growing season.
According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Food Program (WFP) the cereal harvest, of which the largest part is maize, Lesotho's staple food, has dropped by 40-50% this year.

Mokhotlong, September 2007: Farmer plowing hillside for planting |
KKM's Executive Committee Chairperson is a small farmer in the southern part of the country, known to be even drier than other parts. He says that the ongoing lack of rains is now affecting their animals, which are beginning to die due to lack of food and water -- and there is nothing they can do. It is mostly these small scale farmers and households in the rural areas, whose livelihoods are agricultural based, who are most affected.
In addition to drought conditions, another influence affecting cereal production has been a declining trend over the past few years in the planted area of cereals with potential farmland left uncultivated mainly due to the uncertainties of agro-climatic conditions, shortage of farm labor and the lack of cash-flow for inputs and investment. ("Lesotho: Food Crisis OCHA Situation Report No.1", UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs - OCHA, 27 July 2007).
This labor shortage can primarily be attributed to the impact of HIV/AIDS in the country where an estimated 23.2% of the population are infected, one of the highest rates worldwide.
As food supply meets demand the vicious cycle of diminished incomes confronted with increased prices kicks in, further exacerbated by reduced harvests in South Africa, the main regional supplier, within whose borders Lesotho lies. As a result, reports indicate the price of 12.5kg of maize meal has nearly doubled since last year.

Terraced plowed fields in Mokhotlong, prepared for planting |
Though assessments point to the vicious cycle of food insecurity brought on by erratic weather, prolonged drought, poverty and the impact of HIV/AIDS they also note that the immediate food and agricultural assistance needed would not significantly change the long-term situation of the affected people.

September 2007: Food Security Stakeholders |
It was out of this situation and these concerns that, on 4th September, KKM called a meeting of stakeholders involved in agriculture and food security in Lesotho to meet and see how we might begin to address such issues together. The key aims of this initial meeting were:
- To hear from each other about our organizations, activities, geographical areas of involvement and developing plans;
- To consider government policies and approaches to food security;
- To agree on a way forward.
Amongst local NGO's were those representing church bodies, including the Christian Council of Lesotho (CCL) and the Lesotho Evangelical Church (LEC), PCUSA's partner church in Lesotho.
We were also pleasantly surprised to have two representatives, including a director, from the Department of Agriculture who were helpful and encouraging once they realized they weren't going to be battered! This department is not generally viewed well by those proactively involved in improving agriculture in the country, so to sense them relaxing and not feeling threatened by the group was a major step forward.
“We need to look at the roots so good fruit is being produced.”
Comment by Consultation Participant |

Food Security Stakeholders Consultation of September 2007 |
Participants comments to the causes or contributions to hunger and poverty in Lesotho ranged from global climate change to local agricultural practices, farming methods and policies, the lack of or inappropriate storage, and the inability to get farming inputs (indigenous seeds, organic manure, etc) to the attitudes and mindsets of the people. It was agreed we all need each other and we must change our own attitudes before we can expect those around us to change theirs. This begins with developing trust and supporting each other rather than competing for resources and "clients".
A challenge to the Department of Agriculture representatives was that government must reflect a commitment to this essential and vital area of response as their leadership is critical. Presently they are seen to only be paying it lip service.
By the meeting's end, it was clear that those attending were serious in their interest to continue this process and were committed to see change in a positive direction. "We don't want another workshop that is just talk," was one initial comment. "Handouts won't end poverty," said another. And, in the end, "We need to look at the roots so good fruit is being produced." |